Transaction Intelligence
AI & Regulatory Diligence
Decision-quality intelligence before the deal closes.
Scrutexity examines the gap between what a target company publicly claims, what its evidence supports, and what AI systems and third-party sources say about it.
Scope
What we examine
A target's public surface is larger than its website. We inventory what a buyer, a regulator, or an answer system could find, and test each claim against the evidence available to support it.
- Public marketing claims
- Product and service representations
- AI-generated company narratives
- Unsupported or weakly supported claims
- Regulatory-pattern matches
- Evidence gaps
- Public inconsistencies
- Claim history and changes
- AI misrepresentation
- Potential diligence questions for counsel
Language discipline
How findings are described
We do not call a finding a violation. That determination belongs to a qualified attorney. Our vocabulary is deliberately bounded so the record stays usable in a diligence process.
- Pattern match
- The language resembles claims that have drawn regulatory challenge elsewhere. Not a finding of wrongdoing.
- Potential exposure
- A commercially material risk worth escalating. Scope and severity are for counsel to determine.
- Documented inconsistency
- Two public statements that cannot both be accurate, each captured and dated.
- Evidence gap
- A testable claim with no visible supporting evidence in the public record.
- Requires professional review
- The question is legal, clinical, or technical, and sits outside what observation can settle.
Deliverable
What the buyer receives
One dated file, structured so a deal team can route findings to the right reviewer without re-reading the whole document.
- 01Dated diligence file
- 02Claim inventory
- 03Evidence map
- 04AI narrative snapshot
- 05Enforcement-pattern analysis
- 06Priority findings
- 07Recommended diligence questions
- 08Remediation priorities
- 09Clear methodology and confidence labels
Position
The report is decision-support intelligence. It is built to be read alongside counsel's review, financial diligence, and technical diligence — not in place of any of them.
What this engagement is not
- Not a legal opinion.
- Not a valuation opinion.
- Not a substitute for professional diligence.
- Not a determination of liability or non-compliance.
- Not a guarantee of any transaction outcome.
- Designed to complement counsel, financial diligence, and technical review.
Scrutexity documents what is publicly observable and organizes it for the professionals qualified to evaluate it. Findings are observations with sources and dates attached, not conclusions of law.
Engagement scope
Engagements typically begin in the five-figure range. Scope depends on transaction size, number of entities, and review depth.
Timelines are set against the transaction calendar and agreed before work begins. Every engagement is covered by a confidentiality agreement, and findings are shared only with the commissioning party.
Next step
Request a Private Diligence Brief
Tell us what you are evaluating and on what timeline. We will confirm whether a diligence file is the right instrument before anything is scoped.