Bounded scope
A defined claim sample agreed before work begins. No open-ended review, no scope drift.
Entry product
Claim Exposure Diagnostic
A focused, dated intelligence review for teams that need to understand exposure before commissioning a broader assessment.
$1,500–$2,500, depending on the number of surfaces and claims in scope.
Purpose
The Diagnostic answers one question.
“Is there enough here to justify a deeper review?”
It is deliberately bounded. A defined sample of public claims, tested against visible evidence, with the findings dated and sourced. Enough to make the next decision responsibly — not a full assessment, and not presented as one.
Dated record
Every observation carries its source and the date it was captured, so the finding stays checkable.
A real decision
The output either justifies a broader assessment or it does not. Both are useful answers.
Deliverables
What you receive
One dated file, sized to be read in a sitting and forwarded without explanation.
- 01Defined public claim sample
- 02Evidence-gap map
- 03Pattern-match review
- 04AI narrative snapshot
- 05Priority findings
- 06Safer language examples
- 07Dated PDF receipt
- 08Executive summary
Where it leads
The bridge into a broader engagement.
Most Diagnostics resolve one of three ways. Each has a defined next step, and none of them is a sales call you cannot decline.
- 01
Narrow and fixable
A small number of claims need substantiation or rewriting. You take the safer language examples and handle it internally.
- 02
Broader than expected
The sample suggests the pattern repeats across entities or locations. An Enterprise Exposure Assessment is the proportionate next step.
- 03
Transaction-relevant
The findings bear on a pending deal. AI & Regulatory Diligence scopes the full target surface against the transaction calendar.
The instrument behind it
The Diagnostic is produced using AuditGPT, the public-claim diagnostic instrument powered by Scrutexity. The instrument captures and structures the claim surface; the analysis, confidence labels, and priority findings are reviewed by a person before anything is delivered.
Boundaries
- Not a legal opinion, and not legal advice.
- Not a determination of liability or non-compliance.
- Not a full assessment of the organization.
- Bounded to the claim sample agreed at the outset.
- Findings are observations with sources and dates attached.
- Safer language examples should be reviewed by counsel before publication.
Next step
Request a Diagnostic
Tell us which surfaces you want sampled and what decision the result needs to support.