Counsel sets the scope
You define the entities, surfaces, and claim categories in scope. We do not expand the review or contact third parties without instruction.
Counsel Intelligence
Evidence intelligence for General Counsel and outside counsel.
Scrutexity organizes the public record so counsel can focus on the legal questions that matter.
Reviewing a company's public claim surface is largely a collection problem before it is a legal one. We do the collection, with sources and dates attached, and hand counsel a structured record.
The record
We document
Every item is captured verbatim, attributed to a source, and stamped with the date it was observed. Nothing is paraphrased into a finding.
- Exact public language
- Source URLs
- Dated captures
- AI answer outputs
- Enforcement-pattern matches
- Evidence gaps
- Claim history
- Changes over time
Application
Counsel uses the record to
The output is an organized evidentiary base. What it means, and what follows from it, stays with counsel.
- Identify issues for legal review
- Prioritize investigation
- Prepare remediation
- Organize evidence
- Track changes
- Support internal risk discussions
- Inform diligence
- Establish a repeatable review record
Working method
Counsel-directed, and privilege-aware.
We do not publish findings
Findings are delivered only to the commissioning party. Scrutexity does not publish, report, or share third-party findings with anyone else.
Structured for review
Each item carries its source, capture date, and confidence label, so a reviewer can verify an observation without reconstructing our work.
The boundary
Scrutexity does not provide legal advice. It creates structured intelligence that counsel can evaluate.
Boundaries
- Not a law firm, and not a substitute for one.
- No attorney-client relationship is created.
- No determination of liability or non-compliance.
- No opinion on the merits of any claim or dispute.
- Findings are observations, not conclusions of law.
- Escalation and remediation decisions rest with counsel.
We describe findings as pattern matches, documented inconsistencies, evidence gaps, and potential exposure. Where a determination requires an attorney, we mark it as requiring professional review and stop there.
Next step
Discuss a Counsel-Directed Review
Tell us the entities and surfaces in scope and what decision the review needs to support.